Sahara AI price

Binance - USDT Market #SAHARA - Unusual buying activity 256K USDT in 17 seconds (13%) P: 0.07771000 🔴 (0.22%) 24H Vol: 2.19M USDT

🎁 Grabbed 8,360 $SAHARA in a few clicks. It really works — I recommend it to everyone! 👉 $Charles $Kirk $Usa $Aster $Bnb $Arizona $Avnt $Dexe $Twt $Eth $Xrp $S $LUNA $VET $ALGO $XLM $MANA $SAND $AXS $CHZ $THETA $PYR $TRIAS $KAS $ADA $DOT $XRP $BNB $S

Whether it's BN Alpha or spot trading, many AI projects have recently emerged. Looking solely at the fundamentals, there is hardly any reference value left; instead, background resources have become the most crucial aspect to focus on. Today, I will compare the recent popular AI projects and also discuss ChainOpera @ChainOpera_AI, which will be on Alpha tomorrow, to see if it truly is a "gang organization" dedicated to Crypto AI. 1️⃣ In terms of financing scale, 0G leads with nearly $140 million, Sahara is in the middle with about $49 million, OpenLedger is on the lighter side with $8 million, while ChainOpera stands at $17 million. On the surface, ChainOpera does not have a "numerical advantage," but this actually indicates a more favorable pricing phase: as part of the mainstream narrative of Crypto × AI, the high financing of 0G and Sahara has essentially been priced in, while ChainOpera, under the premise of not being inferior in resource quality, is still in the pre- and post-TGE phase, where the space has not been fully realized, providing participants with a clearer imagination of "catch-up + revaluation." Moreover, I have always emphasized that higher financing is not necessarily better; before TGE, this is usable capital, and after TGE, this is debt that the project team needs to repay. Considering the current market environment, a reasonable financing amount is a better choice for the project team, as it will result in less secondary pressure. 2️⃣ In terms of team background, several projects have strong academic or resource foundations: 0G comes from the core team of the former Conflux, boasting an unreplicable strong background; Sahara has professors from the University of Southern California and investment backing from Yzi Labs, with most investors attracted by the professors' credentials; OpenLedger has found decent financial backers. ChainOpera's highlight lies in its stronger "academic to engineering" closed loop: the co-founders are a combination of professors and PhDs from the University of Southern California, making it more like a platform team capable of turning the "Agent network" into infrastructure. Such a team background is highly favored by European and American VCs. 3️⃣ In terms of financing background, all four have first-tier capital endorsements: Sahara has secured backing from Polychain, Yzi Labs, Pantera, etc.; 0G has received industry resources from Hack VC, OKX Ventures, Animoca Brands; OpenLedger is supported by funds like Polychain, Borderless, Finality, etc. ChainOpera's financing background is also solid: besides investments from institutions like Finality, Amber, IDG, it also includes founders from EigenLayer and co-founders from Babylon. The investment groups behind these AI projects have a high degree of overlap; for instance, the founder of EigenLayer has invested in both ChainOpera and OpenLedger. Considering the current market buzz, ChainOpera's TGE tomorrow has significant potential, and I will open another discussion for a detailed token analysis.