Blockchain ecosystems are walled gardens.
Ethereum contracts can't talk to Solana. Solana can't read Avalanche etc. This forces devs to pick a chain. I've met a lot of devs and they're rarely as 'tribal' as bag holders. They want to be multi-chain. But this requires:
- Multiple deployments (one per chain)
- Bridge protocols (hacks waiting to happen)
- Different security models
- Fragmented liquidity
- Compatibility nightmares
Devs are better off building deep than wide. Build more features for your current users, than expand to more segments.
Plus, crypto history is littered with the bodies of those who tried to go wide - mostly due to inherent failure of bridging ($2B+ stolen in 2022-2023).
AO actually does solve this. It operates above the chain layer. One smart contract, that can send prompts to any chain!
No bridges needed. No redeployments. No fragmented liquidity.
AO is not a blockchain. It's a computation layer.
So what does this mean for devs?
Build once. Deploy everywhere.
But it solves so much more than just the multi-chain problem.
By separating computation from consensus users pay for security (cheap) and storage (one-time), with computation running at near-zero marginal cost.
This unlocks many new use cases such as running AI models on-chain, complex scientific calculations and real on-chain gaming.
Right now it's basically a testnet. But it's interesting tech worth watching imo.
Disclaimer: Persistence Capital holds AO tokens in its portfolio. DYOR. NFA. Investing in cryptocurrency is risky.
2,648
3
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。

