Blockchain ecosystems are walled gardens.
Ethereum contracts can't talk to Solana. Solana can't read Avalanche etc. This forces devs to pick a chain. I've met a lot of devs and they're rarely as 'tribal' as bag holders. They want to be multi-chain. But this requires:
- Multiple deployments (one per chain)
- Bridge protocols (hacks waiting to happen)
- Different security models
- Fragmented liquidity
- Compatibility nightmares
Devs are better off building deep than wide. Build more features for your current users, than expand to more segments.
Plus, crypto history is littered with the bodies of those who tried to go wide - mostly due to inherent failure of bridging ($2B+ stolen in 2022-2023).
AO actually does solve this. It operates above the chain layer. One smart contract, that can send prompts to any chain!
No bridges needed. No redeployments. No fragmented liquidity.
AO is not a blockchain. It's a computation layer.
So what does this mean for devs?
Build once. Deploy everywhere.
But it solves so much more than just the multi-chain problem.
By separating computation from consensus users pay for security (cheap) and storage (one-time), with computation running at near-zero marginal cost.
This unlocks many new use cases such as running AI models on-chain, complex scientific calculations and real on-chain gaming.
Right now it's basically a testnet. But it's interesting tech worth watching imo.
Disclaimer: Persistence Capital holds AO tokens in its portfolio. DYOR. NFA. Investing in cryptocurrency is risky.
2,512
3
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

